2002-06-18 - incident - Bardiya district २०५९-०३-०४ - घटना - बर्दिया जिल्ला
Archive ref no: NCA-06168
Alleged incident overview | घटेको भनिएको घटनाको समीक्षा
Information regarding alleged incident | घटेको भनिएको घटनासम्बन्धी जानकारी
- Source: 2005-02-00 - report - HRW |
- श्रोत: २०६१-१०-०० - प्रतिवेदन - एचआरडुबल्यू
- 146. Janak Prasad Upadhaya
- A group of about thirty uniformed RNA soldiers came to the Deudakala VDC, Bardia district home of twenty-seven-year-old Janak Prasad Upadhaya, a farmer, during the night of June 18, 2002 (Ashad 4, 2059). The soldiers broke down the door of the home, and demanded to know which person was Janak Prasad. Prasad identified himself, and the soldiers ordered him to get dressed and come with them. He has not been seen or heard from since.
- Three months after the "disappearance," a relative went to Chisapani Army Barracks to seek information, but the officials told her they knew nothing about the case. The family reported the case to local human rights organizations. According to the family, Janak Prasad was not involved with the Maoists.141
Incident Reference Tools | घटनासम्बन्धी सन्दर्भ सामग्री
Legal Reference |
- Source: 2012-10-08 - report - OHCHR
Applicable International Law
- During armed conflicts of all types, a substantial body of law – with both international and domestic origins – is in operation. In terms of international law, two main systems applied during the conflict – international human rights law (IHRL) and international humanitarian law (IHL). These two systems are largely complementary and mutually reinforcing, with the shared objective of protecting life and human dignity. The primary difference between them is when they apply. IHRL provides protection during times of peace and times of war, while IHL applies only during periods of armed conflict. Both systems of law consist of treaties ratified by states parties, and of customary international law. (continue reading)
लागु अन्तर्राष्ट्रिय कानुन
- सबै प्रकारका सशस्त्र द्वन्द्वहरूमा राष्ट्रिय तथा अन्तर्राष्ट्रिय दुवै रूपमा निर्माण भएका कानुनहरूको समूह कार्यान्वयनमा रहेको हुन्छ। अन्तर्राष्ट्रिय कानुनको सन्दर्भमा, दुईवटा प्रमुख प्रणालीहरू द्वन्द्वको क्रममा लागु गरिएका हुन्छन् र ती हुन् अन्तर्राष्ट्रिय मानवअधिकार कानुन र अन्तर्राष्ट्रिय मानवीय कानुन। यी दुवै प्रणाली एक अर्काका परिपूरक तथा एक अर्कालाई मद्दत पुर्याउने खालका छन् र यिनीहरूको साझा उद्देश्य मानव मर्यादाको संरक्षण गर्नु हो। यिनीहरूबीचको प्राथमिक भिन्नता भनेको ती कतिबेला लागु हुन्छन् भन्ने हो। मानवअधिकार कानुनले शान्ति र युद्ध दुवै समयमा सुरक्षा प्रदान गर्दछ भने मानवीय कानुन सशस्त्र द्वन्द्वको बेला मात्र लागु हुन्छ। दुवै कानुनी प्रणाली पक्षराष्ट्रद्वारा अनुमोदित सन्धिहरू र प्रथाजनित अन्तर्राष्ट्रिय कानुनबाट निर्माण भएका हुन्छन्। (बाँकी पढ्नुहोस्)
- Source: 2012-10-08 - report - OHCHR
Enforced Disappearance: Governing Legal Framework
- Enforced disappearance is defined in similar terms under both IHL and IHRL. Comparing the "elements of crimes" associated with the Rome Statute with a definition of enforced disappearance taken from key texts within the human rights legal arena, the result is as follows: (continue reading)
बलपूर्वक बेपत्ता पार्ने कार्य: सम्बद्ध कानुनी खाका
- “बलपूर्वक बेपत्ता पार्ने कार्य”लाई अन्तर्राष्ट्रिय मानवीय कानुन तथा मानवअधिकार कानुनअन्तर्गत एकै किसिमले परिभाषा गरिएको छ। रोम विधानमा परिभाषा गरिएअनुसार मानवीय कानुनअन्तर्गत बलपूर्वक बेपत्ता पार्ने कार्यका तत्वहरू र मानवअधिकारको कानुनी क्षेत्रका मुख्य पाठबाट लिइएको यसको परिभाषाको तुलना यस प्रकार गरिएको छ। (बाँकी पढ्नुहोस्))
Reference Documents |
- Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced DisappearanceConvention on Enforced Disappearance
- International Covenant on Civil and Political RightsICCPR
- Optional Protocol
- Supreme Court of Nepal, Habeas corpus decision, 2007-06-01Supreme Court, Habeas corpus, 2007
- Comprehensive Peace AccordCPA
- जबर्जस्ती बेपत्ता पारिनबाट सबै व्यक्तिहरूको संरक्षणसम्बन्धी अन्तर्राष्ट्रि महासन्धिजबर्जस्ती बेपत्तासम्बन्धी महासन्धि
- नागरिक तथा राजनीतिक अधिकार सम्बन्धी अन्तर्राष्ट्रिय प्रतिज्ञापत्रआईसीसीपीआर
- स्वेच्छिक प्रोटोकल
- सर्वोच्च अदालत नेपाल, वन्दीप्रत्यक्षीकरणसम्बन्धी फैसला, २०६३-०२-१८सर्वोच्च अदालत, वन्दीप्रत्यक्षीकरण, २०६३-०२-१८
- विस्तृत शान्ति सम्झौताशान्ति सम्झौता
